Skip to main content
AGORA
Draft for review. Not linked, not indexed, not in the sitemap. The prevalence figures need verification before this is published.
◆ Concept

Who runs your city?

Guess first, then flip the switch. Same city, same council, same voters, two arrangements of who holds the executive power, and a different answer to almost every question about who to call.

For scale before you start: council-manager is the most common form among American municipalities, it is the majority arrangement among cities of 10,000 people or more, and more than 120 million people live under it.

First, a guess

In most American cities, who actually runs day-to-day government?

The two forms side by side, in plain text, with sources

The same comparison as the toggle above, both columns at once.

Who runs the administration day to day
Mayor-council: The mayor, directly
Council-manager: A city manager, appointed by the council
Who hires and fires department heads
Mayor-council: The mayor
Council-manager: The manager
Who prepares the budget the council votes on
Mayor-council: The mayor's office
Council-manager: The manager
How that person got the job
Mayor-council: Elected by the city
Council-manager: Hired by the council, on a professional contract
How that person can be removed
Mayor-council: At the next election
Council-manager: By a council vote, at any time
What the mayor does
Mayor-council: Runs the executive branch, often with a veto
Council-manager: Chairs the council and represents the city; usually one vote among equals
Who you can vote against if you dislike how the city is run
Mayor-council: The person running it
Council-manager: The people who hired the person running it

This is the arrangement most people picture, and it is more common in older and larger cities, particularly across the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest. Accountability is direct: one person runs the city and faces the voters for it.

Here the city is run by a professional who answers to the council rather than to the electorate. The case for it is real. It was a Progressive-era reform aimed at machine patronage, it puts a trained administrator in charge of a complex operation, and the council can replace a manager who is failing without waiting four years. The trade is equally real. The person making most operational decisions never appears on your ballot.

How to find out which one you live under

Look for a city manager or chief administrative officer on your city’s website. If there is one with a department reporting to them, you are almost certainly in a council-manager city, and your mayor has less operational power than you assumed. If the department heads report to the mayor, you are in a mayor-council city. The charter says so explicitly, and it is usually online.

It is worth five minutes, because it changes who to write to. Under one form, an operational complaint goes to the person you elected. Under the other, the same complaint goes to a council member who has to raise it with someone they hired, which is slower, less direct, and completely invisible unless you knew the structure in advance.

Where this leaves you

The pattern is the same one that keeps turning up. The structure is public, written down, and free to read. It is also something you would only ever look up if you already suspected it mattered, which nobody does until the day they need the city to do something and cannot work out who is refusing.

Knowing the form of government does not get you an answer. It tells you which door your question has to go through, which is the beginning of the problem rather than the end of it.